Search results for " european court of justice"

showing 10 items of 10 documents

The European Courts and the Security Council: Between "Dédoublement Fonctionnel" and Balancing of Values

2009

The recent case law of various international tribunals facing questions related to UN Security Council resolutions shows the clear tendency to grant primacy to the UN legal order. This trend, far from being well founded on formal arguments, appears to be a tribute to a legal order perceived as superior, and, at the same time, is revealing of the ‘value oriented’ approach followed by the courts. Such an approach can be categorized from a theoretical perspective in the light of Scelle's theory of relations between legal orders, whereby the courts implement in their respective legal orders values stemming from the UN legal order. Various critical remarks can be advanced in relation to this att…

Balance (metaphysics)Security interestValue (ethics)Human rightsmedia_common.quotation_subjectCommon lawAppealrelations between legal orders primacy of UN legal order balancing of values human rights security interestDédoublement fonctionnelBalancing of ValuesOrder (exchange)LawPolitical Science and International Relationsprimacy of the UN legal order European Court of human Rights European Court of Justice Kadi case Behrami and Saramati case balancing of interests security interest v. human rightsEuropean Court of JusticeSociologyRelation (history of concept)European Court of Human RightsLawSettore IUS/14 - DIRITTO DELL'UNIONE EUROPEAUN Security Councilmedia_commonSettore IUS/13 - DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE
researchProduct

Of Direct Effect, Primacy and Constitutional Identities. Rome and Luxembourg enmeshed in the Taricco Case

2017

International audience

Constitutional Court European Court of Justice direct effect primacy constitutional identities Taricco caseConstitutional Courtdirect effectprimacyEuropean Court of JusticeSettore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionaleconstitutional identitieTaricco caseComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences
researchProduct

Protection of Personal Data and Human Rights between the ECHR and the EU Legal Order

2020

The present paper deals with the relationship between privacy and data protection, having regard to the European Union and the European Convention of Human Rights. Such an analysis moves from the normative context (art. 8 ECHR and art. 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union). Moreover, the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human RIghts is taken into account, in order to enlighten the dfferent scopes of privacy and data protection.

Data Protection Privacy European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice scope of art. 8 ECHR scope of art 7 and 8 of the Charter of Nice.Settore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionale
researchProduct

Non è titolo esecutivo europeo la decisione emessa senza la specifica indicazione dell’indirizzo dell’autorità giudiziaria cui proporre opposizione

2018

L'articolo indaga, attraverso un esame di una pronuncia della Corte di Giustizia Europea, in merito al titolo esecutivo europeo e, in particolare, sulla rilevanza dell'informazione resa al debitore al fine di poter opporre il detto titolo nei suoi confronti The article investigates, through an examination of a ruling by the European Court of Justice, on the European enforcement order and, in particular, on the relevance of the information given to the debtor in order to be able to oppose the said title against him.

European Enforcement Order European Court of JusticeSettore IUS/15 - Diritto Processuale Civiletitolo esecutivo europeo Corte di Giustizia EuropeaSettore IUS/02 - Diritto Privato Comparato
researchProduct

Alcune riflessioni sull’indipendenza giudiziaria nel contesto europeo

2023

This article aims to provide some reflections on the links between judiciary independence, the rule of law, and the role of judges both national and European. First of all, it focuses on the evolution of the role of the judge in the constitutional and European systems. Then, it shows how the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights have developed criteria to ensure the independence of judges, analysing them. Moreover, it examines the criteria that have been developed by the European courts and by the opinions of the Consultative Council of European Judges about the independence of the Judiciary Councils.

Judiciary Independence European Court of Justice European Court of Human Rights Rule of law Judicial Council.Settore IUS/21 - Diritto Pubblico Comparato
researchProduct

Striking a Balance among Security, Privacy and Competition. The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIP)

2015

Following the ECJ decision that declared the Data Retention Directive invalid, the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIP) has been enacted. It is not indisputable whether the DRIP gives more powers to the intelligence services at the detriment of both citizens’ privacy and freedom of enterprise or whether it simply clarifies the nature and extent of obligations that can be imposed on telecommunications service providers based outside the UK under Part 1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). The article provides news also on Data Retention Regulations 2014, R (David Davis MP and Tom Watson MP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and the proposed…

Settore IUS/01 - Diritto Privatoprivacy security competition DRIP DRIPA RIPA data retention data retention directive european court of justice C-293/12 Digital Rights Ireland C-594/12 Seitlinger investigatory powers data retention and investigatory powers terrorism balance human rights telecommunications
researchProduct

L'orario di lavoro nel diritto dell'Unione Europea

2015

L’articolo analizza la normativa europea in materia di orario di lavoro (dir. 2003/88/CE) per come interpretata dalla Corte di Giustizia. Più in particolare vengono discusse le nozioni di orario e tempi di lavoro e la regolamentazione di ferie, lavoro notturno, riposi giornalieri e settimanali, e le discipline speciali; specifica attenzione è dedicata alle deroghe che secondo la direttiva possono essere apportate dall’autonomia collettiva ed individuale alla disciplina legale, per sottolineare come il diritto dell’Unione abbia determinato una marcata liberalizzazione dei tempi di lavoro. The present work analyses the EU legislative framework on working time (dir. 2003/88/EC) and the related…

Settore IUS/07 - Diritto Del LavoroCorte di Giustiziadir. 2003/88/CEdiscipline specialiderogheWorking timedir. 2003/88/ECnight workriposiannual leaveOrario di lavoroliberalizzazioneliberalizationEuropean Court of JusticeOrario di lavoro; Corte di Giustizia; dir. 2003/88/CE; riposi; ferie; lavoro notturno; deroghe; discipline speciali; liberalizzazionerestwaiversspecial disciplineWorking time; European Court of Justice; dir. 2003/88/EC; rests; annual leave; night work; waivers ; special disciplines; liberalizationferielavoro notturno
researchProduct

Il Trattato di Maastricht trent'anni dopo: a not so pearl jubilee?

2022

The Author critically study the impact of the Maastricht treaty in the light of the actual state of the European Union and of the Brexit

Settore IUS/14 - Diritto Dell'Unione EuropeaEuropean Union Brexit European Court of Justice European LawSettore IUS/02 - Diritto Privato Comparato
researchProduct

Le idee e il muro del suono. I programmi per elaboratore nella più recente giurisprudenza europea

2013

Computer programs in the most recent european case law

Settore IUS/14 - Diritto Dell'Unione Europeaprogrammi per elaboratore software proprietà intellettuale diritto d'autore corte di giustizia giurisprudenza europea diritto industriale SAS World Programming dir. 2009/24 dir. 1991/250 dir. 2001/29 UsedSoft Oracle BSA Infopaq computer programs intellectual property copyright IPRs ICT european court of justice ECJSettore IUS/01 - Diritto PrivatoSettore IUS/04 - Diritto Commerciale
researchProduct

I tempi di lavoro e di riposo nel diritto dell'Unione Europea

2017

L’articolo analizza la normativa europea in materia di orario di lavoro (dir. 2003/88/CE) per come interpretata dalla Corte di Giustizia. Più in particolare vengono discusse le nozioni di orario e tempi di lavoro e la regolamentazione di ferie, lavoro notturno, riposi giornalieri e settimanali, e le discipline speciali; specifica attenzione è dedicata alle deroghe che secondo la direttiva possono essere apportate dall’autonomia collettiva ed individuale (“opt-out”) alla disciplina legale, per sottolineare come il diritto dell’Unione abbia determinato una marcata liberalizzazione dei tempi di lavoro. The present work analyses the EU legislative framework on working time (dir. 2003/88/EC) and…

special regulationSettore IUS/07 - Diritto Del Lavorodir. 2003/88/CEdisciplinas especialedir. 2003/88/ECnight workOrario di lavoro; Corte di Giustizia; dir. 2003/88/CE; riposi; ferie; lavoro notturno; deroghe; discipline speciali.riposilibéralisation.derogacioneannual leaveliberalisation.European Court of JusticerestTribunal Europeo de JusticiaWorking time; European Court of Justice; dir. 2003/88/EC; rests; annual leave; night work; waivers; special regulations; liberalisation.waiverCour de Justice de l'Union Européennelavoro notturnoTemps de travail; Cour de Justice de l'Union Européenne; dir. 2003/88/CE; congés; répos; travail de nuit; dérogation; secteurs spéciaux; libéralisation.Tiempo de trabajo; Tribunal Europeo de Justicia; dir. 2003/88/CE; vacaciones; descansos; trabajo de noche; derogaciones; disciplinas especiales; liberalización.Tiempo de trabajoCorte di Giustiziadérogationtrabajo de nochederogheWorking timevacacionetravail de nuitcongéliberalización.Orario di lavoroTemps de travailrépodescansoferiediscipline speciali.secteurs spéciaux
researchProduct